by admin | May 13, 2024 | Blog, Child Custody, Child Custody Lawyer, Child Custody Lawyer Edmonton
It’s only natural and fair to feel overwhelmed and uncertain about the road ahead when you’re facing a custody battle. However, as an Experienced Child Custody Lawyer in Edmonton, Alberta, we can’t stress enough the importance of maintaining a level head and making informed decisions throughout this challenging process.
At Kolinsky Law, we understand that your child is your top priority under these circumstances. So we’re here to guide you every step of the way in this emotional battle.
Unfortunately, even the parents with best intentions can inadvertently make mistakes that could compromise their custody case. Let’s have a look at some common missteps to avoid, ensuring you don’t make any such mistake. This approach can help you start your custody battle with a clear mindset and a strong legal strategy.
Mistake #1: Failing to Prioritize Your Children’s Best Interests
In the heat of a custody dispute, it’s easy to get caught up in personal grievances or a desire for vindication. However, the courts will always prioritize the children’s best interests above all else. Any actions or statements that appear to prioritize your own desires over your children’s well-being could work against you.
Instead, focus on demonstrating your commitment to co-parenting, maintaining stability, and fostering a nurturing environment for your kids. This approach not only aligns with the court’s objectives but also shows your dedication as a parent.
Mistake #2: Disparaging Your Co-Parent in Front of the Children
While you may have fairgrievances against your co-parent, venting those frustrations in front of your children is a surefire way to undermine your case. Not only does it create an unhealthy environment for your kids, but it could also be perceived as an attempt to alienate them from the other parent.
Maintain a respectful and civil demeanor when discussing or interacting with your co-parent, especially in the presence of your children. This level-headed approach demonstrates your ability to prioritize your kids’ emotional well-being, even in the face of personal conflicts.
Mistake #3: Denying or Limiting Court-Ordered Visitation
Unless there are legitimate safety concerns, denying or limiting your co-parent’s court-ordered visitation rights can have severe consequences. Not only does it violate the court’s orders, but it also paints you as an uncooperative parent unwilling to facilitate a healthy relationship between your children and their other parent.
If you have valid concerns about visitation arrangements, address them through proper legal channels. Withholding visitation without justification will only undermine your case and potentially lead to further complications.
Mistake #4: Making Major Decisions Without Consulting Your Co-Parent
While you may have primary custody, significant decisions regarding your children’s upbringing, such as education, healthcare, or relocation, should ideally involve both parents. Unilateral decision-making, unless explicitly granted by the court, could be viewed as a lack of co-parenting and a disregard for your co-parent’s rights.
Whenever possible, consult with your co-parent and make a genuine effort to reach a mutually agreeable solution. If an agreement cannot be reached, seek the court’s guidance rather than taking matters into your own hands.
At Kolinsky Law, our Experienced Child Custody Lawyers in Edmonton, Alberta, are here to help you navigate this complex journey. We understand the emotional toll custody battles can take, and we’re committed to providing compassionate guidance while protecting your legal rights and your children’s best interests.
Don’t hesitate to reach out to our team for a consultation. Together, we’ll develop a comprehensive strategy that avoids common pitfalls and positions you for the best possible outcome in your custody case.
by admin | Aug 8, 2023 | Best Lawyers in Edmonton, Blog, Child Custody, Child Custody Lawyer
When it comes to family dynamics, custody arrangements carry significant weight in determining how parents share responsibilities and time with their children after separation or divorce. Alberta, Canada, offers various custody options, each with its own distinct features and implications. This article aims to elucidate the differences between sole or full custody, joint custody, shared custody, and split custody arrangements prevalent in Alberta, providing clarity on the diverse choices available to families navigating these intricate situations.
1. Sole or Full Custody: Who Holds the Decision-Making Reins?
Sole Custody:
What is sole custody, and how does it work?
Sole custody designates one parent as the primary decision-maker and custodial parent. In this scenario, the custodial parent holds the authority to make major life decisions, such as education, healthcare, and religion. While the non-custodial parent may have visitation rights, the custodial parent’s decisions typically prevail in matters pertaining to the child’s upbringing.
When is sole custody considered?
Courts often consider sole custody when concerns arise about the non-custodial parent’s capacity to provide a stable and secure environment for the child. Factors like a history of abuse, neglect, or substance abuse play a pivotal role in determining whether sole custody is appropriate. However, visitation rights for the non-custodial parent may still be granted under these circumstances.
Full Custody:
Is there a difference between full custody and sole custody?
Full custody is often used interchangeably with sole custody, yet nuances exist between the two. In a full custody arrangement, the custodial parent retains all decision-making authority and primary responsibilities for the child. The non-custodial parent’s role is often limited to visitation rights, unless otherwise specified.
In Alberta, the distinction between sole and full custody might not be of utmost significance, as both arrangements emphasize the custodial parent’s authority and responsibilities.
2. Joint Custody: Finding Harmony in Shared Responsibilities
What does joint custody entail?
Joint custody involves both parents sharing decision-making responsibilities and authority for their child’s upbringing. However, this arrangement does not necessarily entail equal time-sharing between parents. Joint custody emphasizes collaborative decision-making for significant life choices, fostering a balanced role for both parents.
When is joint custody an option?
Joint custody thrives when parents can effectively communicate and cooperate with one another. This arrangement upholds the value of involving both parents in the child’s life and promoting stable transitions between households. Tailoring the arrangement to the family’s unique dynamics ensures the child’s best interests remain paramount.
3. Shared Custody: Balancing Time and Responsibilities
What sets shared custody apart?
Shared custody surpasses joint custody by incorporating an equal or nearly equal distribution of time and responsibilities between both parents. Children in shared custody arrangements spend substantial time with each parent, often following a schedule that alternates between households at regular intervals. Shared custody aims to provide a balanced distribution of parental duties and presence in the child’s life.
When does shared custody thrive?
Shared custody is contingent upon a high level of parental cooperation and communication. The shared nature of responsibilities requires parents to work together harmoniously, ensuring equal participation in decisions and parenting duties. This arrangement prioritizes consistency and meaningful relationships with both parents to support the child’s emotional well-being and overall development.
4. Split Custody: Recognizing Individual Needs
What defines split custody?
Split custody is an arrangement designed for families with multiple children, where each parent has primary custody of at least one child. This approach acknowledges that each child has unique needs and relationships with both parents. Consequently, split custody recognizes that the best arrangement for one child may differ for another.
When is split custody considered?
Split custody is most relevant when children’s individual needs diverge significantly. While this approach allows children to maintain strong relationships with both parents, it can lead to siblings being separated. Courts weigh individual child’s needs and relationships when assessing the feasibility of a split custody arrangement.
5. Legal Factors: The Best Interests of the Child
In Alberta, custody decisions are guided by the “best interests of the child” standard. This legal principle places the child’s physical, emotional, and psychological well-being at the forefront. Courts consider factors such as the child’s age, relationship with each parent, parental ability to create a stable environment, and willingness to foster the child’s relationship with the other parent.
Kolinsky Law for Child Custody
Selecting an appropriate custody arrangement is a consequential decision that shapes the post-separation dynamics of families. Alberta presents a spectrum of custody options: sole custody, full custody, joint custody, shared custody, and split custody. Ascertaining the right fit involves prioritizing open communication, cooperation, and, above all, the child’s best interests.
Navigating the complexities of custody arrangements requires careful consideration of family dynamics and legal implications. Seeking advice from our lawyer well-versed in Alberta’s family law ensures that the chosen custody arrangement aligns with the unique needs and priorities of each family.
by admin | Apr 27, 2022 | Blog, Child Custody, Child Custody Lawyer
The parent-child bond creates a powerful connection that few people would let go of willingly. Although divorces and breakups are famous for inspiring disputes over money, an Edmonton family lawyer will tell you that the most emotional conflicts arise from child custody disputes. Although the law recognizes that children need a relationship with both parents and promotes shared parenting as the ideal, full custody remains an option when the circumstances demand it.
Only very narrowly defined circumstances provide grounds for a judge to restrict parental rights and award full or sole custody to one person. A parent or other guardian petitioning for full custody must prove that the other parent is unfit and cannot fulfill the best interests of the child.
Canadian Child Custody Terminology
When parents talk about child custody, they are often lumping together the legal concepts of parenting time and decision-making responsibility. These terms correspond to what people think of as physical custody and legal custody respectively. Updates to the Divorce Act in 2021 sought to clarify these terms.
Parenting time is time that a parent spends with a child. Co-parents might split the parenting time equally or set up a schedule that fits their lifestyle and the best interest of the child. Parenting time is the aspect of child custody that involves being with the child and providing physical care. The second aspect is decision-making responsibility.
The amount of parenting time someone has does not necessarily correlate with decision-making responsibility, which is the legal right to direct important elements of a child’s life. A parent with this right makes choices related to a child’s cultural and religious upbringing as well as education, health care, and other activities.
A parent who wants full custody, also known as sole custody, likely wants all parenting time and all decision-making responsibility. For sole custody, lawyers in Alberta to pursue such a request, they need to present convincing evidence about parental unfitness.
What Is an Unfit Parent in Alberta?
A judge may rule that a parent is unfit due to:
- Abuse of alcohol or other drugs
- Mental illness
- Domestic abuse
- Child abandonment or neglect
The Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act of Alberta sets guidelines for identifying neglect.
Neglect occurs when a parent:
- Fails to care for a child properly
- Deprives a child in a social, cognitive, or physiological manner
- Deprives a child of emotional support
- Physically or sexually abuses a child
- Leaves a child in a dangerous place
- Deserts the child
Evidence about a dangerous environment or mistreatment could come from photographs, witness testimony, and police reports. A parent might obtain emergency child custody in Alberta on the basis of preliminary evidence. However, even if a judge grants an emergency custody order for only one parent, the final custody arrangement will not necessarily be the same. A court will take more time and care before making a final ruling on the matter.
A parent or guardian who needs to prove that another parent is unfit will likely want representation from the best child custody lawyer in Edmonton. These are complex cases, and courts are not eager to grant full custody unless a parent clearly threatens the best interests of a child.
How Do I Get Full Custody of My Child in Alberta?
The best interest of the child always guides judicial decisions about child custody. A person seeking sole custody in Alberta must make the case that living with the other parent or allowing that person to make decisions about the child would harm the child or pose a direct danger.
Judges consider many factors when evaluating a child’s best interest. When addressing the question of parental fitness, a judge will think about:
- Did the child have a relationship with the parent?
- Can the parent meet the everyday physical and emotional needs of the child?
- Can the parent provide a stable and secure home life?
- Is there a history of domestic abuse or sexual abuse?
- Does the parent live in the region?
- Is there a history of addiction?
- Is there evidence of a serious mental illness?
- Is there a history of incarceration?
- Will the parent cause physical or psychological harm to the child?
- Will the parent expose the child to drugs or alcohol abuse?
- Does the parent show interest in having child custody?
Can a Child Decide Which Parent to Live With in Alberta?
A court may consider the wishes of an older child but this does not necessarily influence the final decision. A court must evaluate the developmental stage and maturity of the child before factoring in the child’s opinion. Generally, courts do not want to put a child in a position of picking one parent over the other. However, a custody dispute that involves allegations of abuse, neglect, or parental substance abuse might require input from the child.
How to Gather Evidence That a Parent Is Unfit?
A parent who wants full custody likely already has some evidence of parental unfitness against the other party. To prepare a thorough case, a parent can contact at Kolinsky Law in Edmonton any time. The burden is on the parent to prove that the other parent should be restricted from contact with the children. A court may order an in-home child custody evaluation to assess the situation and provide a judge with a professional third-party opinion.
Evidence to support allegations against an unfit parent could come from many sources, such as:
- Medical reports about child injuries
- Arrest reports about the parent
- Statements from teachers, childcare workers, relatives, or neighbors
- Pictures of drugs or drug paraphernalia in the home
- Pictures of bad living conditions
- Medical testimony about a parent’s serious psychiatric condition
Talk to a Child Custody Lawyer in Edmonton
When your child’s safety is in peril, you cannot make compromises. Before believing that you cannot get full custody, get the opinion of a family lawyer at Kolinsky Law. We have experience handling complex and contentious child custody disputes. We can communicate your evidence effectively and promote your child’s best interests in court. For an accurate assessment of your parental rights, contact our office in Edmonton immediately.
by admin | Mar 9, 2022 | Blog, Child Custody, Child Custody Lawyer, Child Support
Federal and Alberta Child Support Guidelines separate child support expenses into two categories. Section 7 of the federal law describes child-related expenses beyond the baseline expenses considered within Section 3, such as housing, clothing, and food. Section 7 broadens the scope of the expenses covered by child support in Alberta to include additional or extraordinary bills necessary for maintaining a child’s lifestyle and wellness.
Families have different incomes and needs. The Alberta Section 7 expenses guidelines do not require every parent to pay every type of expense authorised by Section 7. Your individual circumstances and justifiable desires determine the assignment of these expenses. Consulting a lawyer experienced with Alberta family law will provide you with specific insights about how your child support will be calculated.
What Do Section 7 Child Expenses Include in Alberta?
Child care expenses – A custodial parent who needs to pay for child care for the purpose of going to work or attending school for employment has a legal right to request support from the other parent to cover a share of this cost. A parent who is ill or disabled also may request support to pay for child care services.
Health-related expenses not covered by insurance – The uninsured cost of medical and dental services qualifies as a Section 7 expense. This category includes bills for prescription drugs, orthodontics, and prescription lenses.
Post-secondary education – Just as couples who together share the burden of paying for their children’s attendance at universities or trade schools, separated or divorced parents must do the same. Support payments could apply to tuition, school housing, fees, and text books.
Extracurricular activities – Children often produce additional costs for music lessons, athletics, and other organised group activities. These enriching activities are often viewed as important for a child’s development and happiness. A court will likely agree that both parents should split the cost of extracurricular activities especially if the child participated in them prior to the end of the parents’ relationship.
Extraordinary educational costs – Section 7 recognises that children may require additional services during primary or secondary school. Examples of these expenses include fees for tutors or field trips.
Medical and dental insurance premiums over $100 annually – Keeping a child on a medical or dental plan costs money. The law will support reasonable requests that child support amounts include a share of the expense of a child’s portion of the insurance premium.
Who Pays Section 7 Child Expenses?
The Federal Child Support Guidelines expect both parents to contribute to Section 7 expenses. The division of the cost might be equal or unequal depending on parental income.
Whether you will be receiving or paying a portion of a Section 7 expense, you need to be ready to document your income and the need for the support. The health conditions of a special needs child can be illustrated with reports and letters from medical professionals.
When Are Section 7 Expenses Necessary?
As with all things related to child custody and support, the best interests of the child guide judicial decisions about Section 7 expenses. Your request that a child support order includes one or more Section 7 expenses needs to include supporting documentation that demonstrates the need for the payment.
A court weighs Section 7 decisions based on:
- Necessity
- Reasonableness
- Family spending patterns
Necessity presents the first factor. A child with health problems will need to see medical professionals more often than the average healthy child. Additional medical bills and insurance premiums will burden the parents financially. The necessity of these expenses is quite clear.
Outside of obvious necessity, an expense might still be deemed necessary if it would serve the best interests of the child. A child gifted in academics, music, or athletics, might already have been engaged in special programs or attending a private academy. Such expenses could qualify as a necessity because denying the child the opportunity to continue these activities would go against the child’s best interests.
Even if you cannot argue that an expense is absolutely necessary, it may be reasonable. Any child, even in the absence of special talents, deserves a chance to participate in extracurricular activities. Therefore, athletic fees or travel costs for field trips could meet the standard of reasonableness under many circumstances.
Additionally, most parents agree that their children should have a chance to attend post-secondary educational institutions. Having both parents contribute to the cost is reasonable.
However, the reasonableness standard could help you push back against requests for support that appear unreasonable. For example, if a parent suddenly wants a child to go to private school, then a court might not agree that the extra expense is reasonable in light of the parent not desiring it previously.
Family spending patterns factor into Section 7 expense decisions as well. Previous spending behaviour can help a judge know whether an expense is reasonable. Family law directs the courts to try and maintain a child’s material lifestyle after a divorce. Expenses that parents were paying for prior to a divorce create a pattern that justifies a continuance of paying for those expenses.
How Are Section 7 Expenses Calculated in Alberta?
Parents with roughly equal income levels would divide the bills 50/50. The share shifts when one parent has a higher income. For example, a parent whose income is 30% higher than the other parent’s income would pay a share 30% higher than the co-parent.
Various tax deductions, credits, or other subsidies could also factor into the support amount that a parent is directed to pay. Any available benefits that would reduce the cost burden of a child-related expense would deduct from the amount that either parent needs to pay.
Negotiating Section 7 Expenses Between Parents
You do not have to leave the final decisions and calculations of Section 7 expenses in the hands of a court. Parents may negotiate between themselves privately about how they will divide the extra costs associated with raising their children.
Although coming to terms with a former partner can be challenging, you would benefit from working out a deal privately. You would not have to wait for a court date or pay the extra legal fees necessary for a hearing before a judge. You also avoid the risk of a court not approving your request or burdening you with a cost that you had not expected to pay.
Advice from a child support lawyer in Edmonton could prepare you to negotiate these expenses. A lawyer will help you understand what expenses are included in child support. This information lets a parent know what would be included under Section 3 and what could qualify under Section 7.
When speaking with the co-parent, you may find it helpful to present the receipts for the current expenses. The documentation could aid in resolving the matter when a parent sees what services are being provided. If you think that you are being asked to pay too much or a co-parent rejects your request, an Edmonton family lawyer can advance the issue to a courtroom and communicate your needs.
Speak With an Edmonton Child Support Lawyer
Most parents want what is best for their children. When negotiating child support amounts with a co-parent, you need to know everything that should factor into that decision. At Kolinsky Law, we represent people in all matters of family law. We aim to broker efficient solutions that meet a family’s financial situation whether that means going to court or conducting private negotiations. To make fully informed decisions about child support, contact our office today.
by admin | Jan 27, 2022 | Best Lawyers in Edmonton, Blog, Child Custody, Child Custody Lawyer, Child Custody Lawyer Edmonton, Divorce and Separation, Divorce Lawyer, Divorce Mediation, Family Divorce Lawyer, Family Law Lawyer, Family Lawyer
When you contemplate divorce, you will naturally recall the divorce experiences shared by your friends and relatives. As a result, you might misinterpret individual outcomes or opinions as facts about Divorce in Alberta when they are actually myths. The Best Edmonton Divorce Lawyers are often able to protect people’s rights and negotiate reasonable resolutions when people end a marriage or common-law partnership. Before making assumptions about your rights, we want to debunk common divorce myths.
Myth 1. Paying child support means you automatically get parenting time.
Child support and parenting time represent two separate issues that must be worked out in accordance with the law. The courts make child support decisions based on the financial circumstances of the parents. On the other hand, the best interests of the child guide parenting time decisions.
Multiple variables go into determining what is best for a child. Although the law emphasizes that children normally benefit from time with both parents, circumstances could prevent you from having time with your child. Threats to child safety or a parent’s inability to provide adequate housing are examples of issues that could cause a court to deny parenting time.
Myth 2. My spouse’s infidelity gives me an advantage in divorce court.
You may want the legal system to sympathize with you when your spouse has an intimate relationship outside of marriage. However, this behaviour has no bearing on the legal rights of either person. Neither the federal Divorce Act nor Alberta’s Family Law Act reduces rights to property or parenting time on the basis of infidelity.
Myth 3. I can’t get a divorce unless my spouse agrees to do it.
Not true. One spouse may initiate the divorce even when the other spouse disagrees with the action. Our Divorce Attorney Edmonton could help you plan your next steps when you want to end your marriage, including moving out of the marital home. With legal support, you should be able to successfully complete court applications and overcome the difficulties that can arise when the other person will not cooperate with the process.
Myth 4. You won’t have to pay spousal support if your spouse has a job.
Although you may think that the law only authorises spousal support for spouses who did not work outside the home, this is not entirely true. In the eyes of the law, a court could order spousal support due to a large difference in income between spouses.
According to federal and provincial law, the purpose of spousal support is to reduce the financial hardship that can arise when a low-earning spouse leaves a marriage. A judge will consider first whether spousal support is appropriate and then weigh it against factors, like whether the recipient lives with someone else but remains responsible for paying household bills.
You should not make assumptions about either paying or receiving spousal support. This issue is often highly contested, which makes legal representation important should the subject arise during your Divorce in Alberta.
Myth 5. The property you owned prior to marriage will stay yours after the divorce.
Believing in this divorce myth could result in an unpleasant surprise when you go to divide the property. Your exclusive right to keep a property will depend on multiple issues. Although buying it prior to marriage could prove that it is nonmarital property, the picture becomes unclear under many circumstances. For example, if you paid the mortgage on your home out of a joint account that your spouse put money into, then your spouse arguably owns a portion of the value.
Myth 6. Moving out of my house means I’ll lose it in the divorce.
Your property rights do not cease because you move out of the marital home, especially if your name is on the title. Even in the absence of being on the title, family law could still grant you rights to the home that must be settled to complete a divorce. This is important to keep in mind if you feel unsafe in the home and need to get out. Leaving will not cause a forfeiture of property rights. Those rights are decided by title documentation, family law, and who makes payments on the property. However, you may want legal advice when planning your exit so that you do not unnecessarily complicate your case.
Myth 7. Mothers have the advantage in child custody decisions.
Fathers often worry that the legal system views them as less than mothers. This is one of the most persistent Alberta divorce myths, but parental gender is NOT a deciding factor for parenting time or decision-making responsibilities. Both parents have an equal right to see and care for their children in the absence of issues, such as a history of family violence or the inability to maintain a child’s physical, emotional, and psychological safety.
Courts consider only the best interests of the child when making custody orders. A parent’s relationship with the child and willingness to fulfill a child’s needs are the most significant factors. Should you feel that your divorce is threatening your time with your child, you should consult an Edmonton Child Custody Lawyer right away. You do not have to accept the loss of a parent/child relationship unless something specific disqualifies you.
Myth 8. Failing to pay child support means you lose your parenting time.
Falling behind on child support payments is a financial issue separate from your right to care for your child and make parental decisions. Although being in arrears for unpaid child support is a serious issue, it does not present a legal reason for the co-parent to deny you time with your child.
Myth 9. Common-law partners don’t need to negotiate the division of property.
Yes, they do. In legal terms, common-law partners are known as adult interdependent partners. As of Jan. 1, 2020, Alberta’s Family Law Property Act established that adult interdependent partners must divide their property according to rules similar to a divorce for formally married people. If you are uncertain whether your relationship meets the definition of an adult interdependent relationship, you should consult a divorce lawyer.
Myth 10. Retirement accounts and pensions are not subject to property division.
Your retirement savings accounts, including those sponsored by an employer or your self-employed savings, and pensions ARE subject to property division during a divorce.
Myth 11. You don’t have to pay child support for stepchildren.
There are circumstances when the law obligates people to pay child support for an ex-partner’s children from another relationship. Actions such as formally adopting a stepchild, naming the child in your estate plan, or having the child as a beneficiary of your health insurance plan could create liability for stepchild support after your marriage ends.
Myth 12. You get half the marital assets in a divorce.
Alberta family law calls for an equitable division of marital assets and property. Although this often turns out as a 50/50 split or very close to it, the equitable standard really means that division should be fair. Some splitting couples agree to an unbalanced division in recognition of what each person honestly deserves. However, disagreements about what is equitable are common and can lead to disputes that must be resolved through mediation or litigation.
Make Decisions Based on Facts Not Myths
Unique factors and finances define every marital relationship. The steps for how to get a Divorce in Edmonton, Alberta might be slightly different for one person compared to another. You might arrange an amicable split with minimal legal support or require a strong litigator to defend your rights to parenting time, financial support, or property.
At Kolinsky Law, we have experience with all aspects of Divorce and Separation in Edmonton, Alberta. We strive to provide the results that you desire in an efficient manner that is appropriate for your family situation. Let us help you resolve your divorce or child custody issues. Call (780) 757-6400 or email our office today.
